RIP: A Remix Manifesto -review by Andrea De Vito

pirate pic.png

Left Copy activist Brett Gaylor, in his creative commons documentary RIP: A Remix Manifesto, lends  support to musician Greg Gillis (aka Girl Talk). Their idea is that Copy Write, Fair Use and Creative Commons laws are negatively affecting this new and sky rocketing genre of art in the music world. He depicts his point using what he calls Copy Left (a notion left of the music industry, at hand) in stead of Copy Right (being as how the laws now stand). The Copy Right laws blatantly state: Protection extends not only to copies of the written word and recordings of sound, but to visual images such as photographs, animated images, motion pictures, or videotapes. It also includes taped live performances. Gaylor and Gillis ask for answers in black and white, as they can only be viewed in many shades of Grey, entailing the dichotomy of Copy Right and Copy Left legal issues as they continue to walk on a Fair Use, Creative Commons and Copy Right tightrope. The objective of the documentary is in full the opinion of the makers, insinuating a fair point that this form of art is not illegal via copy right infringements, but a turning point that will impact the world of music as a unique and desired art form. Fair Use blatantly states: fair use of copyrighted materials in teaching and instruction and for research, Published works that were never copyrighted. Creative Commons blatantly states: the public permission to share and use your creative work — on conditions of your choice.

Gillis, a biomedical engineer by day and live-masher DJ sensation by night, has gained tremendous recognition for his amazing talents in mashing and mixing sampled recognizable themes, (famous copy written selling hooks…) as well as using plenty of unrecognizable copy written samples. This film does not depict, or intend to include that he has written any original hits to mashup, contributing to his fame. Nor has he been asked by these authors to mix their pieces. Whether he’d be an awesome mixer of his own material or not, it’s not the repertoire at hand in this film. His art form has created controversy for this very reason:

He’s brilliant at creating extremely technical, monumental, mixes of famous hooks owned by others, into mashups and is an energetic live performer, iconic to this new sensational genre, these powerful live performances are recorded and available on the www. *but he uses other’s works of fame to gain his own fame without the authors permission and in my opinion…, quite illegally.

Gillis shares his mashups with other mixers on the internet, calling the mashup his legal piece of art. Knowing these illegal elements that make them so unique and that he is using for his own purposes does not, in any form or way, fall under appropriate guide lines of either Copy Right, Fair use or creative commons. This is causing great dismay in the music industry. But Gillis does not want to take ‘no’ for an answer, therefore he isn’t asking for anyone’s permission for usage.

There are valid questions. Is the music industry ridiculous? Do changes need to be made with EMI, and music royalties?  I think so, in many ways. The Industry is not stopping art from moving forward though, or stopping genres to change in the music industry. What good would that do for their profit? Are there are too many facets in the music industry to keep up with as it is changing? Uh huh. That’s the problem that needs to be dealt with appropriately, and in my opinion, not dishonestly. There are Copy Right laws that crossover one another continuously as the industry does change.

I believe Gaylor’s and Gillis’s point is moot. No matter what art you would like to create, in my opinion, keep creating. If there is a legal point that arises and you know it, I believe you must stick with the program as you put forth the efforts as you are gathering together the logistics before acting against them. Purposefully breaking a current law isn’t rallying for your cause and taking one specific step at a time for his cause. It may be painstaking as Gillis is trying to make legal changes to benefit himself and even perhaps, a good cause. But, communication is what’s needed as he is try to taking these steps toward making a change. It will come along with it’s validity. If you want to be part of history, famed for your efforts in the future, I say, buck up and take small steps needed in progression. It’s been done like this for millions of years. In this film Gaylor and Gillis are trying to depict that this is in fact what he is doing, but truly, he is continuing with what he wants only because he hasn’t gotten sued yet or thrown in jail. No matter how talented he is, or unfair anyone thinks it is, consider the fact, that going about  it in this manner could be making it worse than moving it forward to a more progressing solution. This may even negatively impact other artists and their quests in the future as well. Don’t be a Pirate to prove a point and get what you want. Get to work for your purpose, as you believe in it so strongly.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s